Open
Questions.
The protocol is a living experiment. We have identified structural paradoxes that require Collective Intelligence to solve.
The Subjectivity Paradox
How do we mathematically verify the "quality" of design or creative writing without centralizing authority? Code has unit tests; aesthetics only have consensus. We are currently modeling **Recursive Peer-Weighting**—a system where a designer's vote strength is a function of their historical "Visual Sync" accuracy.
Identity Collision & Latency
Preventing "Double-Syncing" across Layer 2 environments remains a challenge. If a UID initiates a vote on Base while bridging XP to Mainnet, the protocol risks an **XP Ghosting** event. We need a more resilient "Lock-and-Verify" primitive for the UID layer.
Inactivity Penalty Thresholds
Is a 21-day decay window too aggressive for deep-focus "monk mode" cycles? We are gathering data on average developer sprint lengths vs. creative incubation periods. The goal is a **Dynamic Entropy Function** that scales decay based on your specific contribution type.